Introduction
In my previous post on the need for and uses of a bibliographic software, I mentioned that there were three indispensable tools for every researcher:
- A writing tool
- A bibliographic tool
- A note-taking tool
NOTE: There may be others that more experienced researchers use, but these are definitely the ones that take up much of my writing energy.
Some folks use Microsoft Word for all three phases of writing. I’m not an evangelist (well, not for software anyway), so if that works for you, then keep right on chugging along. What ultimately matters is your progress and whether you can churn out quality writing with the tools at your disposal. However, if you’d like to test out another procedure, then keep on reading.
The key is maximum flexibility
When taking notes you need ultimate flexibility. Here is my minimum list of requirements for any software, which you are using to take notes:
- It must combine word processor and file management capabilities (this means you can look inside a document without having to “open” it.)
- It should allow you to create individual “folders” and /or “documents” that can contain text, links, images, or videos or a combination of all of them
- It should contain a navigation panel to allow you to move freely from folder to folder or document to document
- You should be able to view your data as an icon on a navigation panel, a page, as an outline, or as an index card and you should be able to move icons and index cards to different locations at will
- It should allow for multiple tags to be added to each “record” so you can search on any tag
- It should have the ability to search for text and save those searches for later use
- You should be able to attach documents or links to any “folder” or “document”
- You should be able to gather up any set of “folders” or “documents” into a collection and save collections for later viewing
- You should be able to e-mail files, documents or text to your note-taking software
- You should have the ability to sync with a server to access your folders or documents from any computer or mobile device
There are very few programs that do all of those things and do them well. I have found two that are worthy of mention: Evernote and Scrivener. I currently use Scrivener because its word processor is more robust, but either is a good choice.
Here’s a video showing some of Scrivener’s useful features:
One drawback of note-taking software
One of the few drawbacks of using a non-word processor to gather your notes is that you will not be working in a final product environment.
If you prefer to insert your footnotes, tables, columns and images into your document exactly as they should appear the first time around, then you should probably stick with a regular word processor. I like the note-taking software for the flexibility it offers and for its ability to let me organize my thoughts. I worry about the format later.
Organize From the Get Go!
Ultimately, whatever software you decide to use, you must take care to periodically review your notes and organize them in some fashion.
If you’re like me, you can sit down for weeks at a time, copying references out of secondary literature, jotting down notes from the biblical text, all the while thinking that you’ll go back later to make sense of it all. However, you might just end up with hundreds of tiny references which can be time consuming to sift through.
Review your notes often and categorize them appropriately. Set up a little organization system from the start, either with tags or simply with an outline. Indeed, having a broad outline, and then slotting your notes into these categories is probably the best way to go about it. It works even better if your outline is quite detailed since you will begin to build up good content by adding notes to specific outline categories.
That’s about all for now.
Happy researching!
Pingback: Bibliographic software – A researcher’s dream | Phd and Dissertation Advice
I have been using scrivener for a while, and I would like to learn how did you manage to change the color of folders so that it becomes more organized… I searched for this function in scrivener menus, none found… Thanks, bye
Jerry:
If you highlight the folder then right-click (control-click on a Mac) you should get a drop down menu. Select Label, then Edit. From here you can add, edit or delete labels. If you double-click on the color, you’ll get the color wheel to change to different colors.
I hope this is what you were looking for. If not, send me another e-mail.
GK,
No offense, but color coding based on document level (chapter, section) is a bit redundant. Why not instead color on another meaningful context? I assume you’re using argument/counter-argument or thesis/antithesis in your dissertation, or something similar? (I should say I’m a fiction author who has a juris doctorate, and found Scrivener too late for school but am considering for another project.) Or, perhaps when using a certain type of citation (Bible, extra-biblical) to buttress a point. Yes, you’ll have multiple citations per, but there’s probably one that’s key, and it has a category.
Also, you can set the color when viewing a document. If you have the Synopsis & General open there’s a section for labels. You can edit the labels there. I use labels for characters, so I’ve renamed the labels “Characters.” I’ve also created Collections in Scrivener based on the characters. This allows me to view a character’s entire storyline in one solid flow, to ensure internal consistency. Even in a strictly academic paper there’s got to be some way to make this “alternate structure” via categories/labels work.
You mention slotting based on categories, I think that’s my point.
Also, why limit your writings to sections? I assume its based on your outline, but I would think to use folders/sub-folders for structure, and documents for specific arguments. In my context, that’s easily 100 documents. With Scrivenings its possible to view multiple documents together, so you can still view them as a whole–even if you end up having one document per paragraph (which I sometimes do). Had I used this for my law school papers, I would have written one document per item, which would have given me maybe 80 cards for a simple 20-page paper. (I ended up using LaTeX for my papers.)
Also, as you know, it’s possible to have two major folders, one for the manuscript, another for research.
Finally, I hope you’re using something like Dropbox to archive your work to, so you won’t suffer setback.
Thanks for this blog. I’m considering writing something along the lines of Calvin & Arminius. While you’re on a much finer point (it appears), it’s encouraging.
Dear Dashau:
Thanks for a great lesson on using Scrivener. (You should write a book for us Scrivener blokes.)
Admittedly, when it comes to coding, my mind is still on “Chapter 1,” then “1.1” then “1.1.1” like the way a published dissertation is laid out. Your suggestions are thoughtful and potentially fruitful. Thanks for your contribution.